As a tax advisor, your goal is to help clients avoid as many taxes as they can within the bounds of the law while taking precautions to avoid crossing the line into tax evasion.

Note: If you have not yet read the Gregory v. Helvering case, please do so before continuing with this task. A link to the case is provided in the web links section.
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Write an essay in which you:

A. Explain the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion referencing sources besides the given “Cases Citing Gregory” attachment.
1. Discuss two examples of tax avoidance using two cases from the “Cases Citing Gregory” attachment.
2. Discuss two examples of tax evasion using two different cases from the “Cases Citing Gregory” attachment.

B. Discuss how the cases Yung v. Grant Thornton LLP and Agilent Technologies Inc. v. Department of Revenue (found in the web links section) characterize tax avoidance as either tax liability minimization or tax evasion.

C. Explain why tax avoidance can be classified as tax liability minimization or tax evasion.

D. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

Get a 30 % discount on an order above $ 150
Use the following coupon code :